The Dynamics of
Conflict
By: Craig
Runde
Workplace
conflict—situations in which people have incompatible goals,
interests, principles, or feelings—is inevitable. It can also
be disruptive. Studies show that managers typically devote
more than a third of their time to dealing with conflict and
its consequences. Unmanaged conflict accounts for some 65
percent of work-performance problems.
A New Approach to Conflict
Management
The Conflict
Dynamics Profile® (CDP) was created by the Leadership
Development Institute at Eckerd College to help address
conflict in the workplace. This 360° assessment tool, also
available in a self-assessment version, focuses on specific
behavioral responses to conflict. The ultimate goal is not to
eliminate but to manage conflict, reducing the harmful impact
and maximizing beneficial aspects such as problem solving and
creativity.
The CDP measures the degree to which
individuals display
- constructive responses —behaviors that move
toward problem solving
- destructive responses—behaviors derived from
fight-or-flight survival instincts that inflame or prolong
conflict and make it personal
- active and passive responses —which can be
either constructive or destructive
It also looks at
- hot buttons—behaviors in others that irritate
or frustrate the individual enough to provoke conflict
- the organizational/contextual perspective—how
the measured behaviors are regarded within the culture as
potential career derailers
This high degree of behavioral specificity and
the fact that it is available as a 360° assessment distinguish
the CDP from the Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument
(TKI). While the CDP gives feedback on real conflict
behaviors, providing a concrete focus for change, the more
general TKI simply provides individuals with an understanding
of their stylistic approach to conflict: competitive,
compromising, collaborative, accommodating, or
avoiding.
A Vital Component of
Leadership
Developed primarily
for use in leadership development, the CDP is used by the
Center for Creative Leadership® in its Foundations of
Leadership Program to assess a vital component of
leadership—conflict-resolution behaviors.
I recently
worked with The Ayers Group to certify a dozen of its coaches
in the use of this new instrument. As a result of the
assessment, executives can see what triggers conflict for them
and how they behave once conflict has begun. It helps them
recognize areas of strength and weakness so they can then work
with a coach on a development plan. Because conflict
management brings communications and interpersonal skills to
bear in an extreme context, improvement of conflict-related
responses tends to help executives develop those broader skill
sets—something that carries over outside the workplace as
well.
Although feedback from the assessment is normally
given on a one-to-one basis, to ensure confidentiality, it can
be helpful for individuals to share some
observations—particularly about hot buttons. What triggers a
destructive response in one person might not bother another at
all, so people tend to be surprised when they learn about one
another’s triggers. “I never knew that bothered you!” And once
they know, it’s a whole different situation.
As a
leadership development tool, the CDP can be used
organization-wide or for small groups. In this application, it
is receiving wide use with managers in U.S. and Canadian
corporations and government agencies—often in tandem with the
less involved self-assessment version for supervisors and
lower-level employees. The versions share a common vocabulary
and conceptual model, making them ideal for use together
within an organization.
Other
Applications
Hospitals are using
the CDP with nurses because conflict tends to arise during
their shift changes, when complex information has to pass
between individuals quickly and around interaction with
doctors.
Tech companies have begun using the tool
because people in engineering roles tend to be good at science
and not as good at communicating and
interacting.
Another application is intervention in
situations where ongoing conflict is causing problems in a
team or high-performance individual. In the case of a team,
the contextual-perspective component of the tool becomes
particularly important. The objective is not only to change
the behavior of team members but also to get them to agree to
new norms for dealing with conflict.
Alternative
dispute-resolution professionals—mediators and
conflict-management specialists—are adopting the CDP as a
preventive measure, to address conflict early in the cycle
before it becomes a dispute.
Back to Top
For more information about CDP and other 360°
products and coaching services available through The Ayers
Group, contact Joan Caruso, Managing Director, Organizational
Effectiveness Consulting, at joan.caruso@ayers.com or
212.889.7788.
Craig Runde
is Director of New Program Development at the Leadership
Development Institute (LDI) at Eckerd College. He received a
B.A. degree from Harvard, a J.D. from Duke, and an M.L.L. from
the University of Denver.